PriceSensitive

A capital‑efficient underground tungsten plan

Market News, Mining, Sponsored
CSE:ACM
16 March 2026 06:45 (EDT)

(Source: Allied Critical Metals Inc.)

Europe’s appetite for secure critical mineral supply is reshaping how tungsten projects are conceived, financed, and permitted.

With this in mind, a new assessment from northern Portugal sets out a case for a capital‑disciplined underground development that leans on proven mining methods, gravity‑dominant processing, and a permitting profile already a step ahead of many peers.

Allied Critical Metals Inc. (TSX:ACM) has released the initial Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) for its 100 per cent-owned Borralha Tungsten Project in northern Portugal—an EU‑based, underground development centred on the Santa Helena Breccia deposit and an initial 11‑year mine plan. The study outlines technically robust design choices and strong economics across multiple pricing frameworks, while emphasizing meaningful growth optionality through drilling and potential throughput optimization.

This article is disseminated in partnership with Allied Critical Metals Inc. It is intended to inform investors and should not be taken as a recommendation or financial advice.

Notably, the mine design and cut‑off selection were developed using a conservative US$659/mtu WO₃ assumption. Recent reported market prices of approximately US$1,998/mtu highlight the project’s leverage to current market conditions, while also underscoring the importance of long‑term pricing realism in economic planning.

(Source: Allied Critical Metals Inc.)

Project snapshot

Initial mine plan – A strong base with expansion potential

Mine life: ~11 years
Processing rate: 1.4 Mtpa
Average mill feed grade: 0.20 per cent WO
Average annual production: ~1,708 t WO
Peak annual production: 2,388 t WO
All‑in sustaining cost (AISC): ~US$303/mtu WO (≈ C$413.84/mtu)

The initial plan incorporates measured, Indicated, and Inferred Mineral Resources from Santa Helena Breccia and maintains steady mill feed to support stable concentrate output. The deposit remains open along strike and at depth, anchoring a multi‑stage growth strategy that extends beyond the 11‑year blueprint.

Important PEA caveat: Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. Inclusion of inferred material introduces uncertainty; there is no certainty the PEA results will be realized.

Mineral Resource framework and cut‑off logic

The PEA builds on the 2025 Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE) for Santa Helena Breccia (NI 43‑101 compliant):

This updated MRE reflects a material tonnage and confidence increase versus March 2024, setting a firmer foundation for mine planning while leaving headroom for additional conversion and expansion.

In an update, the company added that Borralha Project demonstrates strong economics with an after‑tax NPV(8 per cent) of C$473 million, an IRR of 48.8 per cent, and a rapid 2.2‑year payback from the start of production (approximately 4.2 years from construction start) at US$1,000/mtu WO. The project is designed as a capital‑efficient development with an initial capital cost of C$125 million and a compact, integrated infrastructure plan featuring hydro‑electric power, water recycling, road access, and paste backfill. At the same price case, Borralha is expected to generate average annual revenue of C$252.5 million, EBITDA of C$142.2 million, and free cash flow of C$96.3 million, supporting strong cash generation over the initial mine plan. Sensitivity analysis highlights significant upside, including an IRR of 78.4 per cent and an NPV of C$963.8 million.

Mine design, dilution/recovery, and production schedule

Selected mining method:

Production schedule and modifying factors:

Metallurgy and concentrate quality:

Process flowsheet and site infrastructure

Flowsheet highlights:

Infrastructure advantages:

Costs, capital, and price scenarios

Operating costs (LOM):

AISC:

Capital (±35 per cent PEA accuracy):

Price frameworks used in the PEA:

  1. Base (Argus long‑term, variable): averages ~US$704/mtu (e.g., ~$763/mtu in 2028, easing to ~$677/mtu by 2040)
  2. Flat US$1,000/mtu
  3. Flat US1,500/mtu

Design basis: mine geometry and cut‑off at US$659/mtu WO, preserving conservative technical assumptions while allowing the economic model to reflect updated long‑term pricing.

Sensitivity:

Economics are most sensitive to tungsten price, then capital, operating costs, and metallurgical recovery. At the Base Case, the PEA indicates robust operating margins, with significant torque to higher price scenarios. (A flat‑price sensitivity spanning US$500–$1,700/mtu underscores this leverage.)

Market context: With recent spot indications near US$1,998/mtu, the project’s upside torque is evident—but long‑term planning prudently anchors on conservative inputs.

Leadership insights

“This initial PEA confirms the Borralha Project as a high-return, capital-efficient tungsten development project in a Tier-1 European jurisdiction. At US$1,000 per mtu (significantly below current reported market pricing) the Borralha Project generates a 48.8 per cent after-tax IRR with modest initial capital of approximately US$91 million,” Roy Bonnell, Allied’s CEO commented in a media release. “Importantly, this PEA reflects only the Santa Helena Breccia and an initial 11-year mine plan. With future exploration work and the 20,000 metres of drilling currently underway, we are focused on expanding resources, extending mine life and enhancing overall project scale. We believe we are at the beginning of unlocking the Borralha Project’s full potential.

Combined with a favourable Environmental Impact Declaration, we believe that this PEA opens the door to project-level financing for both our industrial-scale plant and our pilot plant at the Vila Verde Project.”

Permitting and positioning

Borralha’s favourable DIA in January 2026 marks a key de‑risking milestone, moving the project toward RECAPE and construction permitting. Within the EU’s critical raw materials agenda, Borralha ranks among the largest undeveloped tungsten resources in the bloc—potentially advancing supply chain security with an underground, gravity‑dominant development that reduces several typical risk vectors (surface footprint, tailings approach, and environmental pathway).

Growth pipeline: Drilling, conversion, and throughput options

A fully funded 20,000‑m drill program is now underway to:

Given mineralization remains open at depth and along strike, Santa Helena Breccia offers straightforward targets for step‑outs and infill. The 1.4 Mtpa plant layout anticipates potential future debottlenecking, subject to engineering outcomes and market conditions.

Risks and uncertainties

As a PEA‑level study, the analysis is preliminary and includes inferred material:

Next steps and QA/QC rigour

Data integrity: The company reports a comprehensive QA/QC regime with ISO‑accredited preparation and certified lab analysis, routine CRMs/blanks/duplicates, re‑assay triggers for outliers, and independent verification by a qualified person—collectively supporting the MRE and PEA data confidence appropriate to study level.

(Allied Critical Metals Inc. stock chart – March 2025 to March 2026.)

Investor’s corner

Allied Critical Metals’ initial PEA for Borralha presents a technically coherent and capital-efficient underground tungsten development within the EU, anchored by conservative design assumptions, competitive AISC (~US$303/mtu), and a favourable environmental declaration that advances permitting. Allied Critical Metals stock has risen more than 450 per cent since this time last year. With recent market pricing well above design inputs and a 20,000‑m drill program in motion, the project carries notable torque to price and scale—balanced by standard PEA‑level uncertainties around resource confidence, costs, and metallurgical variability.

This is a substantive first step, not a final verdict. Consider deepening due diligence across resource quality and conversion rates, metallurgy/variability and by‑product credits, capital discipline and supply chain readiness, permitting milestones and timelines, and sensitivity to WO₃ prices and FX. A close read of the full technical report, QP sign‑offs, and forthcoming drilling updates will be key to validating the investment case as the project advances toward pre-feasibility.

Join the discussion: Find out what the Bullboards are saying about Allied Critical Metals and check out Stockhouse’s stock forums and message boards.

Stockhouse does not provide investment advice or recommendations. All investment decisions should be made based on your own research and consultation with a registered investment professional. The issuer is solely responsible for the accuracy of the information contained herein. For full disclaimer information, please click here.


Related News